The Revival of Bolshevism

Nina A.

Andreeva

May 2008 will be 20 years since the publication of the article by Nina Andreeva, General Secretary of the All Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks “I cannot give up principles!”

The concepts of LENINISM and BOLSHEVISM are the same. Each of them means the theory and practice of revolutionary Marxism in the epoch of imperialism, proletarian revolutions and the dictatorship of the proletariat, plus the inevitable transition of humanity over from capitalism overt to communism.

Marxism-Leninism is the philosophical-sociological, political-economic and social-political basis of the world-mission of the working class and its allies, summoned to put an end to all forms of oppression, exploitation, social inequality, violence and wars between peoples.

Bolshevism having originated in the theoretical basis of Marxism, was worked out by V.I. Lenin and exists as a “current of political thought and as a political party since 1903.”  (V.I. Lenin Complete Works, v.41, p.6 Russian).

After the death of V.I. Lenin, his cause – the continuation of the construction of Socialism in one country, the strengthening of the organizing force of socialist construction – the Communist Party of Bolsheviks – was continued by his loyal disciple and successor – J. V. Stalin.

Under Stalin, under his direct leadership, the Soviet people built a powerful foundation of Socialism and Stalin led the country to the level of a world superpower and defeated fascism in the Second World War.

J.V. Stalin theoretically worked out and marked down the main ways for the gradual transition over from Socialism to Communism, including the liquidation of the commodity production and commodity-money relations. (Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR)

However, after the death of J.V. Stalin there arrived into the leadership of thee party and the country people, who were semiliterate in Marxism, who then carried out a violent replacement of the Stalinist cadres of experienced and loyal comrades to the party, then replaced them with executive personnel, who then transformed the party of Lenin and Stalin – into an apparatus of bureaucrats who were not able to solve state questions politically, very badly new the laws of social development of the socialist economy.

Khrushchev’s personal ambitions and hatred of Stalin became the basis of that malicious speech he made at the XX Congress of the CPSU, and hi so-called criticism of “Stalin personality cult:” and the consequent anti-Stalin hysteria, which had began inside the USSR and was conducted by the traitorous so-called “Loyal Leninists” since the XX Congress.

Was there really a Stalin Cult? Yes there was a cult of boundless trust in Stalin, who gave his entire life to serving the Soviet people. (Stalin was even buried with his own worn-out boots and a shabby military tunic, His relatives did not have to share any inheritance after the death of J.V. Stalin, because there was no inheritance!)

Yes there was a Stalin personality cult, because there was a PERSONALITY – a GIGANTIC PERSONALITY, to which after Lenin there was no equal in the world!

Pigmies now of social science and “democrats” – (mainly Zionists fed with US dollars) carried out a frenzied campaign of vicious slander against Stalin and the cause of Socialism, while at the same time misinforming the society, destroying its morals and moral-political unity. The erosion of the monolithic unity of the Soviet people continued and was well financed in all directions, inside and outside the country – ideological, political, economic and in the moral and cultural life.

Towards the end of 1990’s, under adequate material $$$ and ideological support on the part of US imperialism for the inside the USSR counterrevolutionary processes which had been sponsored and promoted and developed inside the USSR, this counterrevolution was planned inside the country. Gorbachev became the conductor for implementing this plan by the US for destroying the USSR.

Former US President Bush Sr. admitted that: “We spent a trillion US dollars on winning the Cold War and compared to this sum now, the sum which the USA plans to spend now is $24 Billions – this is small change. Our democrats inside the Kremlin are able to guarantee our security much better now than the nuclear missiles used to!”

As can be seen, Gorbachev brought super high profits to US capitalism, having betrayed and sold off the people of the USSR, to “our best friend – America” – as Gorbachev boasted – and in one go betrayed the international communist movement, the countries of socialism and delivered a crushing blow to the working class of the capitalist world – thus depriving them of their social gains won in the long and difficult struggles against Capitalism.

Gorbachev gave the start to his picked successor to power – a betrayal of the interests of the whole nation – for the benefit of US imperialism. Then “Czar Boris Yeltsin” and after that Sobchak’s aid Putin, and now his handpicked and loyal follower Medvedev.

Putin has zealously defended the interests of USA in spite of his public relations rhetoric to the world media.

But what about the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) formed in order to defend the working class, taking on the responsibility of implementing the dictatorship of the proletariat?

As was stated above, the CPSU after the death of J.V. Stalin, became gradually degraded, transforming itself into a party of  Social Democrats, into a party of Mensheviks, By 1990’s the CPSU was already a conglomerate of various ideological platforms and no longer defending the interests of the working class. There were “four platforms” inside the CPSU who spent their whole time into “discussions” attempting to squeeze each other from power. The “Democratic Platform” was composed mainly of Zionists and all kinds of opportunists who penetrated the CPSU after 1953, were betraying the USSR, vilifying Lenin and Stalin. All of them wanted a “new way forward”  and they  huddled as the new Communist Initiative. Gorbachev started his “perestroika” while the neo Trotskytes formed the “Marxist platform” inside the CPSU and fought each other while their main purpose was to dismember the CPSU and also the USSR.

The brutal struggles of the enemies of socialism against our glorious past, the unruliness of these “democrats” and their open calls at demonstrations in Moscow and Leningrad against communists – “All Communists to the gallows!” – The people’s disgruntlement over the absence of commodities and foodstuffs in the stores – all stashed away by these enemies of the Fatherland to cause a crisis amongst the people, especially the youth. The propaganda, the incitement to demonstrate and to riot was all done on a daily bases, while food was rotting in  warehouses and being dumped into landfills. The demand was also made to travel, especially to Israel.

In such conditions the newspaper “Sovietskaya Rossia” published in March of 1988 an article by Nina Andreeva called “I cannot give up principles.”

What were those principles that the Senior Lecturer of the Department of Physical Chemistry of the Lensoviet Chemical Technological University and a Candidate of Science wrote about?  What were these principles that were talked about in the important article that caused such a backlash by these anti-Soviet traitors?

They were –

• The necessity of a class view of the world,
• The understanding of the connection of the common human class interests,
• An analysis of the present events in close connection with that historic setting in which they occurred (for history is not politics, upturned in the past like Pokrovsky, the well-known academician-historian interpreted this),
• The inadmissibility of the absolutization of the subjective factor of social development,
• The inadmissibility of ignoring the objective laws history, appearing in the activities of classes and masses,
• Research of concrete historical processes on the basis of Marxism-Leninism methodology, as the only scientific approach in the study of any  historical process,
• The inadmissibility of running down of the entire epoch of Socialist construction, connected with the immeasurable achievements of an entire generation of Soviet people, from which these modern “democrats” demand “repentance”!

In the judgment of the activity of J.V.Stalin – the outstanding Soviet statesman and political activist of the XX Century – it is necessary emanate from:

• The party-class interests of the epoch of the storms and invasions, the brutal class struggles when the question is solved “The state of the workers and peasants – to be or not to be!” in the internal and international aspect;
• the dialectical conformity of the activity of the individual to the main laws of development of society, and not from the emotion of individual persons, deservedly were repressed by the Soviet State under J.V. Stalin, as these were true enemies of the State of Workers and Peasants. Unfortunately it is mainly these people and their descendants nowadays that have come to power with the help of the US and destroyed the brotherly alliance of peoples with equal rights that were united into the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The disguised cosmopolitan tendency, the certain without-national “internationalism” is nothing other than the appearance of Zionism!

The national pride and national dignity of each people must organically merge with the internationalism of a united socialist society!

The article by Nina Andreeva “I cannot give up principles” was reprinted in 937 Soviet republican, regional, town and branch newspapers, not counting factory newspapers and newspapers of the military subdivisions.

The newspaper ‘Sovietskaya Rossiya” in its jubilee edition of the 50^th year on July 1, 2006, having reprinted this letter in full, as one of the best publications in the newspaper’s history, called this letter “a major political event, a landmark in the history of not just the newspaper “Sovietskaya Rossiya” but also in the history of the Communist Party and the country as a whole!”

This letter of Nina Andreeva and the publicity it attained divided the Soviet society into two unequal parts: into supporters of the letter (that turned out to be 80%) and its opponents (at 20%). Such a ratio of FOR and AGAINST were shown in thousands of letters which arrived in huge sacks  to the newspapers “Pravda” and to “Sovietskaya Rossiya” plus to the Lesoviet  department of physical chemistry, where Nina Andreeva worked.  Large amount letters arrived also at the Zhdanov University in Leningrad were not passed on to Andreeva at all, but were read by the authorities there and then destroyed. This was revealed after by members of the Editorial Boards years afterwards at a meeting.

It was these 80% of Soviet people who expressed their agreement with Andreeva’s Marxism that frightened Gorbachev a lot. He was afraid for the faith of his ”perestroyka-destroyka”. This Nina Andreeva’s letter to the newspapers became the only subject for the two weeks of discussion at the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the CPSU!  At this meeting Gorbachev compelled each CC CPSU member present there, to express their own opinion on this letter in a form of:“Are you for Gorbachev or for Nina Andreeva?”

And if it was not for the cowardice of the majority of members of the Politburo of the CC CPSU, then today we would not have had the problems of solving the crisis of reviving Socialism and the USSR.

The ideological guru of “Perestroyka” – (former USSR Ambassador to Canada and even here in Canada in his dealings with us, he was a traitor and our Executive members saw through him and when he went back we write a scathing letter to the CC CPSU about his actions in Canada. This will be dealt with in full in my next book – “Friends of Soviet People since 1918 – Hands Off Russia Committee – Editor).

Mr. Yakovlev in Moscow at the time of this letter correctly understood the essence because he spoke out in a slashing-vicious article in the newspaper “Pravda” – April 5, 1988 – where he in particular pointed out “Maybe, the first set of readers in such a concentrated form saw in this letter the non-acceptance of the idea itself or renovation a firm account of an entirely definite position, a position in essence, conservative and dogmatic. In essence, two main thesis, but with a red thread passing trough all of its content. His article calls upon all to understand “perestroika and glasnost” – otherwise the authorities will have to save socialism.”

After this article in Pravda by Yakovlev, there then began a persecution of the newspaper “Sovietskaya Rossiya” and Nina Andreeva.

Yakovlev correctly judged this letter by Nina Andreeva to be a revival of that world so hated by him – BOLSHEVISM!

But these traitors were unsuccessful in morally breaking and destroying N.A. Andreeva. On July 13, 1991 in Minsk, Byelorussia at the All Union Conference of the supporters of the Bolshevik Platform inside the CPSU, a Bolshevik Platform was formed inside the CPSU with the aim of “reorganizing” the CPSU, and return to it the ideological role of the advanced party of the working class in their struggle for building a socialist and a communist society; to rebuff the counter-revolutionary forces. It was decided to hold an extraordinary Congress of the CPSU at which Perestroyka would be rejected and bring Gorbachev and his clique to account for the destruction of the CPSU, the Soviet State and for betraying the cause of Lenin and Stalin;  of the October Revolution and splitting the international communist movement in the world.

When the CPSU was banned in September of 1991, a decision was made to call a Constituent Congress on November 8, 1991 where the All Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks (AUCPB) was formed. Nina Andreeva was elected as the General Secretary of the AUCPB.

The article by Nina Andreeva laid down the start of the revival of Bolshevism.

We Bolsheviks will definitely triumph, because our Marxist-Leninist principles have not been given to us on a plate, but have been gained by us on the sharp turns of history of our Fatherland.

On this we stood and on this we will always stand!

Central Committee
All Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks

Close this page to return.